Charles Plessy <email@example.com> writes: > In this thread it was proposed to trust DDs to nominate other members > and I found the idea very interesting. In order to make it more > consensual, there is probably a need for making concessions like > shortlisting the trusted DDs according to some criteria like the time > they have already spent in the project. I would actually be tempted to > propose a more variable but more symbolic measurment of time: having > been part of the project for at least one full release cycle. I don't see why someone who joined the project a few months ago should be trusted less than someone that got in, for example, before we had any formal checking of new members. This idea just doesn't work. Marc -- BOFH #198: Post-it Note Sludge leaked into the monitor.
Description: PGP signature