Re: Q for all candidates: license and copyright requirements
Le Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:42:51PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On the contrary, I'm against point (2) of the GR. I do consider our
> source packages to be part of Debian and hence subject to DFSG. If
> something in upstream tarball is non-free, I believe we should do
> repacking (there, we might use a bit more standardization on how we
> implement get-orig-source in such cases, but that's a different
> issue). In fact, doing that might even be a way to push our upstream to
> get rid of those non-free bits from their tarballs as well.
I explained in my GR proposition what led me to conclude that not everything in
the original archives distributed usptream is a source for Debian. Let's take a
non-free RFC for example, that is not distributed in a binary package and is
not touched at build time. Why do you think it is part of the source of the
Debian operating system?
Have a nice day,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan