On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions". > > PROPOSAL START > ===================================================================== > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the > discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there is no evidence that > changing the number of sponsors (seconds) for GR proposals or amendments > will help solve those problems. Instead, by making it harder to propose > general resolutions or amendments, it might make it harder to improve > imperfect resolutions, or to add valuable options to a ballot. > > Therefore the Debian project reaffirms the current requirements for the > sponsoring (seconding) of GR proposals or amendments, and for overruling > of delegates. > ===================================================================== > PROPOSAL END I second this. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature