Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

* Kurt Roeckx [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:52:22 +0100]:

> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:

> > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR.  It is
> > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> > changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion.  I hope the Secretary
> > will fix this.

> I think the title is also not the best one and just used Joerg's
> title.

> What about:
> General Resolution sponsorship requirements

I’d suggest a minor variation: “Sponsorship requirements for General
Resolutions”.

Thanks,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
        -- Rory and Lorelai