Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > PROPOSAL START > ===================================================================== > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the > discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there is no evidence that > changing the number of sponsors (seconds) for GR proposals or amendments > will help solve those problems. Instead, by making it harder to propose > general resolutions or amendments, it might make it harder to improve > imperfect resolutions, or to add valuable options to a ballot. > > Therefore the Debian project reaffirms the current requirements for the > sponsoring (seconding) of GR proposals or amendments, and for overruling > of delegates. > ===================================================================== > PROPOSAL END Seconded. > This is an attempt to provide a rather neutral "keep things as is" > option. Thanks Lucas. > Also, it would be great if the title of the GR was "enhanced" with > s/Enhance/Change/. Agreed. And the same for the ballot options proposed in the initial mail.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.