Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
> In article <[🔎] 87vdq3gcf6.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> > ========================================================================
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> > to initiate one are too small.
>
> > Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> > a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
> > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
> > period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
> > developers to sponsor the resolution.
> > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
>
> > (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> > ========================================================================
> > PROPOSAL END
> [...]
>
> seconded.
This time it was good.
Kurt
Reply to: