Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes: > as per Constitution 4.1.3, I am proposing the following General > Resolution. Have we really reached the end of the normal informal discussion process on this issue without resolution? Proposing a formal GR now seems very premature. > If you need to understand the rationale, please read the thread on > debian-devel with "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" as > title, especially the 87wsajgefj.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de and > 87mybehqhx.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de postings. For what it's worth, my argument is summarised in Message-ID: <87bprwlp7d.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2009/03/msg00246.html>. I'll underline the point that the discussion is *recent* and *ongoing* on this issue, and many points have yet to be made. It still appears quite feasible that a consensus will be reached *without* invoking any formal procedure. -- \ “I was in the grocery store. I saw a sign that said ‘pet | `\ supplies’. So I did. Then I went outside and saw a sign that | _o__) said ‘compact cars’.” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Attachment:
pgp3RhdsUXDth.pgp
Description: PGP signature