Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18-03-2009 20:55, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
>
>> - - - - - - -
>> General Resolution made in accordance with Debian Constitution 4.1.5:
>>
>> The Debian project resolves that softwares licensed under the GNU Affero
>> Public License are not free according to the Debian Free Software Guideline.
>> - - - - - - -
>
> What is the current ftpmaster ruling on this license? Possibly the same
> question in other words: why are you proposing this as a GR, when that's
> not normally how license evaluation is done?
FTP Master team had announced their position on debian-legal:
| The short summary is: We think that works licensed under the AGPL can
| go into main. (Provided they don't have any other problems).
Quoted from: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2008/11/msg00097.html
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknBrhAACgkQCjAO0JDlykZKQgCfW8i2d8DfTiDaQI15t96j9ViK
Pb0AnRoCt/IYS0cB9BK9R1vZBdxh8I5w
=q+O6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: