Re: Results of the Lenny release GR
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 05:47:00PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Jan 12 18:38, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Agreed. Then again, even if Manoj was rightfully appliing super-majority
> > requirements (which I think he was), it has become clear that, in general,
> > such requirements are not politicaly sustainable. And in practice they
> > don't exist anymore, anyway. I think this would be a good time to propose
> > that they are removed from the Constitution.
>
> Immediately after Lenny is released is a better time, and when I'm
> intending to propose vote(s) to clarify a bunch of this stuff.
>
> Now is not the time and is only going to hurt your chances at getting
> people to agree with you later.
>
> If the DPL wants to release a statement to explain this all he is
> welcome (and encouraged) to do so, I don't think we need a GR though.
> This is one of the DPL's main functions and we did elect him to perform
> that function...
So far he hasn't. Do you have reasons to believe he will? By reading the
vote result announcement, it gives me the impression that he endorses it.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Reply to: