On Sat May 02 00:52, Luk Claes wrote: > It would be a clear indication that the foundation document should get an > update or that the postition statement should get dropped again. I think Manoj's point is that if voting some option X (a position statement in conflict with an FD) means that we have to vote to change the FD or drop X, then why wasn't X a vote to change the FD in the first place? Surely we don't need a vote just to then have another vote... Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature