Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring
- To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:09:43 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090409060943.GA5281@blae.erisian.com.au>
- In-reply-to: <20090325230138.GA30467@blae.erisian.com.au>
- References: <87vdq3gcf6.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <20090323224240.GA28983@yellowpig> <20090324231049.GA12803@xanadu.blop.info> <20090325230138.GA30467@blae.erisian.com.au>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project. [...]
> I realise there are already sufficient seconds to make this a valid
> option on the ballot, but it seems reasonable to see what it actually
> takes to get to the 15 or 30 or so seconds being proposed before voting.
> (From the vote.d.o page I gather there's currently 8 seconds for the
> proposal to require 2Q seconds, and 5 for Q seconds)
So according to the vote.d.o page, the minimum discussion period's done
and a vote could be called for anytime... But there seems to only be 9
seconds for the proposals to require Q/2Q seconds, which is presumably
6 or 21 less than would indicate they're actually feasible...
Cheers,
aj
Reply to: