[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [dissenting]: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

Stephen Gran dijo [Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:28:23PM +0000]:
> > Could you propose an amendement that explicitely says that the current
> > rules don't need to be changed (different from FD), and another one that
> > proposes a compromise by requiring 8 or 10 seconders?
> You're aware that you can propose amendments as well?  It seems rather
> clunky to ask someone to write an amendment they don't agree with and
> hope that the wording is what you want.

To be fair, even more when I'm sitting at home after a full day of
work, I would really prefer putting my ideas in front of the others
and see if they make sense before formally proposing them. Besides,
quite often my English is quite below par to what I read on lists such
as this one - I am not saying that those are Lucas' motivations, but
they are nevertheless real :)

Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF

Reply to: