Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51:37PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >PROPOSAL START
> >General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> >Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> >to initiate one are too small.
> >Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> > a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
> > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
> > period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
> > developers to sponsor the resolution.
> > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
> >(Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> >PROPOSAL END
> Assuming that you'll provide explicit diffs for the constitution:
I'm not really sure how to interprete this. Does this mean you'll
only second it after he changes the proposal to include the diff?