[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Overriding vs Amending vs 'Position statement' [Was: Re: Constitutional issues in the wake of Lenny]

On Sat Mar 14 14:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I'm currently inclined to interprete it so that anything that
> seems to modify an interpretation will require an explicit change
> in some document.  But I'm not sure it's in my power to refuse
> an option that doesn't do so.  So that would be option 2 above.

Yeah, this is what I think too, but Manoj got a lot of flack about it,
hence why I want to make it explicit.


Matthew Johnson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: