Re: Results of the Lenny release GR
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:03:45AM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun Jan 11 10:56, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On the other hand, it appears that the Secretary, the DPL and the Release Team
> > > don't like that we made an exception ONLY for firmware. As per your reply I
> > > will assume you're also in that list.
> > I will note there was a simple majority in favour of releasing Lenny
> > with DFSG violations (take that as you will).
> Relative to... ?
I think you mean both option 3 and 4 ranked above FD. I read that as
"I don't like these options, but if there's no choice, I prefer them over
the ambiguity of not making any explicit decision".
This is hardly the same as "simple majority in favour".
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."