Re: Technical committee resolution
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:57:15AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:48:28 +1100, Anthony Towns
> <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> said:
>
> > 3. When there are 8 members, the Project Leader may appoint any
> > Developer to the Technical Committee replacing the longest
> > serving current member, provided there have not already been 2
> > or more appointments to the Technical Committee during the
> > current Leader's term.
>
> This is a bad idea. The length of term of service is a bad
> indicator of utility of the member to Debian. Consider this scenario:
> what if the longest serving members are the most active members of the
> team, and the newer members being mostly MIA, you have just degraded
> the tech ctte's utility.
>
> The grounds for removing people should be whether they are
> present at all (which is the criteria used when we last shed people
> from the ctte), or some measure of the quality of contribution.
>
> Most of the arguments posited against term limits apply here;
> because this is just term limits in disguise (with a term limit of 4
> years).
AJ explicitely commented that it would be possible for the DPL to
remove/reappoint somebody at one go, essentially making them the
youngest standing member on the TC and recognizing their utility.
Michael
Reply to: