Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions
Don Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> 1: I'd be happier, though, if those proposing and seconding options
> would be more careful about the effects that their options may have,
> and be more vigilant about withdrawing options when more palletable
> options exist.
Absolutely agreed with this sentiment.
> You should not be proposing or seconding an option that you don't
> plan on ranking first.
This seems quite wrong. Why should one not carefully and precisely
phrase and propose an option that one does *not* agree with, in order
to get it voted on?
\ “The cost of education is trivial compared to the cost of |
`\ ignorance.” —Thomas Jefferson |