Re: RFC: General resolution: Clarify the status of the social contract
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea of clarifying what the principles of the project
> actually are, since, as aj said, all the decisions about lenny would
> fall out from the position the project take about the foundation
> documents. While I have always thought that "foundation" implied the
> proposal below, apparently this is not a universally held view.
>
+1!
[...]
>
> ,----[ The social contract is a non-binding advisory document ]
> | This amends the proposal above, and replaces the text of the proposal
> | with: The developers, via a general resolution, determine that the
> | social contract is a statement of principle only, and has no particular
I think "is a statement of principle only" weakens too much the pourpose of the
SC.
What about:
,----[ nice title here ]
| The developers, via a general resolution, hold true the promise made in
| point one of the social contract, and determine that everyday work including
| the one that turns in to the so called releases, include their best efforts
| to accomplish the promise.
`----
Goal: accomplish the promise, as it has not yet been fully accomplished.
Cheers,
- --
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklMXpoACgkQYy49rUbZzloOoACgmxl5ryslRhD2fBPMBisEhA5j
NhIAnjFPvqhixdfYbt9DpRHgDkuiWnQ6
=V0/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: