Re: RFC: General resolution: Clarify the status of the social contract

[Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>]

 [  ] The Social contract is a binding contract, DPL interprets
 [  ] The Social contract is a binding contract, secretary interprets
 [  ] The Social contract is a binding contract, tech ctte interprets
 [  ] The Social contract is a binding contract, individuals interpret
 [  ] The Social contract is a binding contract, new ctte interprets

 [  ] The social contract is binding, but currently flawed, DPL interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding, but currently flawed, secretary interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding, but currently flawed, tech ctte interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding, but currently flawed, individuals interpret
 [  ] The social contract is binding, but currently flawed, new ctte interprets

 [  ] The social contract is binding but may be overridden by a simple GR, DPL interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding but may be overridden by a simple GR, secretary interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding but may be overridden by a simple GR, tech ctte interprets
 [  ] The social contract is binding but may be overridden by a simple GR, individuals interpret
 [  ] The social contract is binding but may be overridden by a simple GR, new ctte interprets

 [  ] The social contract is a goal, not a binding contract
 [  ] The social contract is a non-binding advisory document

 [  ] Further Discussion

        I would hate to have to run that vote.

        I strongly suggest we separate these orthogonal issues.

        manoj
-- 
Any discovery is more likely to be exploited by the wicked than applied
by the virtuous.  -- Marion J. Levy, Jr.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C