[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008 à 12:36 +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
> This is something we need to agree to disagree on. There are people
> who still focus on "The Universal Operating System", and who are
> willing to make compromises in freedom without being willing to make a
> totally non-free OS.

And both categories should already be happy since it is easy to load
firmware distributed in non-free. I’m amazed by the number of posts who
completely ignore this fact and focus on issues that have already solved

In short, the ongoing GR isn’t about this disagreement, for which a
suitable compromise already exists; it is about imposing more
restrictions on the stable release than on the unstable suite.

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: