Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR

To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:32:12 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <7531974.9411229643132204.JavaMail.root@zimbra.xen.brainfood.com>
In-reply-to: <20081218231455.GA19907@dario.dodds.net>

----- "Steve Langasek" <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

> Enforcement of the foundation documents is not defined in the constitution,
> so no, this is not a question of constitutional law.

I'm not clear what you are saying here. Are you saying that the foundation documents do not imply any required behavior for project members? To me the foundation documents are "foundational" in the sense of the Bill of Rights.

-- 
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
ean@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315

Reply to:

References:
- Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
Next by Date: Re: Let's restart from scratch the gr_lenny vote (in a better form this time)?
Previous by thread: Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
Next by thread: Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread