Hi, just so that I've said this here too: On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> wrote: > > > If there is sufficient support, we could also scrap the current > > > vote, change our ballot, add options to it, or something, and restart > > > the vote, but that would need a strong grass roots support (I do not > > > think the secretary has the power to do so). > > I support stopping this GR and starting all over, if this is > possible. > > I won't repeat all the reasons why this GR is seen as problematic; > they have been named at great length already. I just want to add that > even if we finish this GR we won't have the questions solved since we > will continue to discuss what the winning Choice #n actually means, > and this won't do the project any good. > > > As far as I understand from reading the immense threads, most people > > (me included) don't want more options in the ballot. We want separate > > ballots for separate subjects. > > I agree on this point, and I think your proposal is a good starting > point for a new start in general - thanks! > > [..] > > > I hope that you can take that into consideration. +1 And so far I have yet not seen anyone claiming this is a good vote (so I assume basically everybody will be happy with a restart ;-) regards, Holger PS.: plus, I was deeply sadened to see Manojs resignation mail. Thank *you* for all the fish!
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.