Re: Dwindling popularity
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cc: Ean Schuessler <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Dwindling popularity
- From: Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:04:50 +0100
- Message-id: <20081201230450.GA15130@thorin>
- In-reply-to: <20081118235404.GD5758@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
- References: <24910251.19271227051306561.JavaMail.email@example.com> <14679372.19291227051320250.JavaMail.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20081118235404.GD5758@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:54:04AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi Ean,
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:35:20PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Why the heck did you post this to -vote?
I think Ean thought this would be relevant to the discussion. I found his
message insightful, and I appreciate his contribution.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."