Re: DFSG violations in Lenny: new proposal
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:23:26PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> And that if we release now, the glibc code which we ship will be free
> shortly, without having to update stable, whereas the code shipped in
> the kernel won't be free in Lenny, however long we wait (because the
> solution is to remove/replace it)
Usually true, but not always so. See #494010.
Which is taking surprisingly long to be fixed. Makes me wonder what
"best effort" truly means...
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."