[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds: Revised ballot


On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
> When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
> 60 days or more

besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of "who determines 
how" (that the DFSG has been violated) I have been thinking that I would be 
much more comfortable with it, if the timeline would be 120 or 180 days 
instead of 60. (Rationale: legalise moves much slower than code.)

But probably thats a minor point too.


Attachment: pgp_5Mj_FQK11.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: