Moin, On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote: > When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for > 60 days or more besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of "who determines how" (that the DFSG has been violated) I have been thinking that I would be much more comfortable with it, if the timeline would be 120 or 180 days instead of 60. (Rationale: legalise moves much slower than code.) But probably thats a minor point too. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpsNGREJzkFp.pgp
Description: PGP signature