[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - Project infrastructure team procedures

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 02:05:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin a écrit :
> > > 
> > > * Infrastructure teams are encouraged to adapt their sizes to their workloads,
> > >   to ensure that they don't block or slow down the work of other Debian
> > >   contributors.
> Hi Josip and everybody,
> I understand that ad-hoc GRs can be suspected to be too much investment
> of time for a punctual result. This makes me conclude that if we want
> this GR to be the most useful, then indeed it is important that it
> defines what an infrastructure team is, and who decide which team
> matches the definition.

So you agree with what I said in the message you responded to, good :)

> Similar to the way constitution and simple laws are hierarchised in some
> countries, this GR may be most useful if written in a way that it can be a
> reference that is not a "foundation document", but still can be modified
> by further GRs in the future if needed.

Yes, that is my intention, just a normal policy/position statement,
as described by Constitution 4.1.5, and the same as we have done in the past.

(The same section defines foundation documents, but this would not be one.
To make a new foundation document, we would actually have to modify the
list in Constitution

     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Reply to: