[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Technical committee resolution

Le lundi 10 mars 2008 à 09:21 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> * Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [080310 03:49]:
> > The idea is to encourage DPLs to appoint two new members during their
> > term, so we get new blood in the committee, and people don't get stuck in
> > the committee until they eventually fade away from the project.
> Though I agree the idea in general, I don't think mechanically replacing
> the two longest serving members is a good idea. It might be better to
> allow the DPL to just replace any two members of the ctte. 

How about considering ctte members having failed to participate in two
consecutive decisions as having resigned?

> On the other
> hand, I would keep the current addition policy "as default".

Agreed. The DPL could have the ability to sneak in, but only when the
current process doesn’t work for some reason.

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: