On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > 2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership > > > post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately. > > > > Is there any reason to reduce this time period? Having a buffer zone > > of three weeks is useful for continuity and/or cases where the > > nomination period must be extended (though it leads to a short lame > > duck period). > > I agree. No reason was given AFAICS, so I propose: > > ==== AMENDMENT PROPOSAL ==== > Point 2 remains as before; that is, it will still read: > 2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post > becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately. > ==== AMENDMENT PROPOSAL ==== > > and I ask for seconds. seconded. > > Regards, > - -- > MJR/slef > My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ > Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFGtv1tmUY5euFC5vQRAhiYAJ4+xFCBeWWsx3/a4vYgawPczh8R2QCgjPUs > IdfLHM6ubbxd9NHnmGmyv4A= > =Jv11 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
pgpDGc3q_FEwE.pgp
Description: PGP signature