Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal - Use Cases
On 27/06/07 at 21:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Anthony Towns wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> >> >> able to tell you the right number.
> >> >
> >> > TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
> >> >
> >> > merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
> >> >
> >> > and via anonymous rsync by anyone at
> >> >
> >> > keyring.debian.org::keyrings
> >>
> >> With that keyring (rsync), the number reduces to 901.
> >
> > Could you please make that list public,
>
> Not really. I don't have a public space available. I could mail you the list
> if you could host it.
Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
well, if you don't mind.
> > and maybe also sort us by the number of occurences?
>
> You are a DD, so you shouldn't appear on the list. Maybe you meant something
> else?
Sorry, I meant that it would be interesting to have that list sorted by
the number of occurences, to see who are the DM 'candidates' that are
(co-)maintaining a lot of packages.
> > Also, some teams automatically add their members to the Uploaders:
> > field. So you could you do the same analysis, but only considering the
> > Maintainer field, not the Uploaders field?
>
> Ok, but then you would lose the maintainers which have the list address as
> the maintainers.
That's OK. The problem is that some teams put all the team members in
the Uploaders field of every package. See libcommandline-ruby for
example.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: