Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure if the formulation proposed by your amendment is totally
> clear. [...]
It's as clear as it is now: DPL (not DPL-elect). The end of the
polling period is not necessarily the election date.
Notice polling closed before the DPL's election for a few years now:
http://www.fr.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_001
http://www.fr.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_002
http://www.fr.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_001
http://www.fr.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_001
This is not something new in the amendment I proposed.
Hope that explains,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: