Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:25:33 +0200, Bastian Venthur <email@example.com> said:
> On 02.08.2007 17:12 schrieb Kalle Kivimaa:
>> Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> No. And that's a good thing.
>> Actually, *if* each and every developer formally seconds the
>> resolution, I think the secretary could forego the actual voting
>> procedure as blatantly obvious.
> I think even if only "each and every developer"/2 + 1 would second
> this, we could be fine without a vote, couldn't we?
Well, since this is a constitutional amendment, you need more
than a 50% majority ....
> Besides the fact this is never going to happen, I agree with Wouter
> and think it's generally a bad idea.
Living in the complex world of the future is somewhat like having bees
live in your head. But, there they are.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C