Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:38:15AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Please formulate a GR and I'll second it immediately. 18-24 months seems
> > sensible, annual elections are a waste of everyone's time.
>
> FWIW, I believe that 2 years is too long, both for the DPL who may have
> to assign much more time to it than now, and for the project that may
> suffer under one DPL and would suffer even longer.
I don't think "suffer" under a DPL is the right word. Never the less, I
do not intend to touch the recall vote procedure, so I don't think this
could go too far.
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
Reply to: