[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
>* Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> [2007-07-31 13:35]:
>>  5.2. Appointment
>>    1. The Project Leader is elected by the Developers.
>>    2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
>>       post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
>>    3. For the [-following three weeks-] {+first week+} any Developer
>>       may nominate themselves as a candidate Project [-Leader.-]
>>       {+Leader, and summarise their plans for their term.+}
>>    4. For three weeks after that no more candidates may be nominated;
>>       candidates should use this time for campaigning [-(to make their
>>       identities-] and [-positions known).-] {+discussion.+} If there
>>       are no candidates at the end of the nomination period then the
>I second this.

According to § 3 of the "Procedures for submitting a General
Resolution proposal or amendment" [¹] you are _only_ seconding items
5.2.1 trough 5.2.3 and part of 5.2.4.

Is that what you would like to do?

¹ http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal

>Kind regards
>Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
>For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: