On Sunday 29 July 2007, Clint Adams wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:12:51PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > The top complaints I'm reading from this thread are: > > > > 1. it has been proposed by AJ > > 2. it is too detailed (the micromanagment argument) > > I'd better complain then. > > 1. It creates another class of Debian participant when we should be > striving to have fewer classes. Does it really? as pointed out earlier in threads about this we have 900+ non-DD maintainers. so it seems to me that this "class of Debian participant" already exists. All the proposal does in that respect is make the existing relation official. > 2. It empowers the wrong people. It empowers a group of current contributors to do their contribution in a more efficient manner. By doing so it also free's up time of other contributors playing middleman for the first group. How is this in any way a bad thing? -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.