On Sat, Mar 03, 2007, Peter Nuttall wrote: > There are 9 people standing, with a wide range of ideas in their > platforms. If you fail to be elected, will you still work on things > from your platform? Which bits and why? > > You may prefer to answer this: What part of your platform cannot be > done without the DPL working on it and why? The things I cannot do without being DPL or being empowered by the DPL are: appointing new people, requesting reports from delegates, using Debian money to sponsor meetings (which is not an idea of mine but that I fully support). This may not seem much in comparison with all I have in my platform, but it is the first step. Appointing people to do the jobs will make things move tremendously fast. I know consitution 8.2 prevents the DPL from saying "I'll delegate you if you choose to do XXX". But there's nothing preventing the DPL from saying "so you want to do XXX? all right, I'm delegating you." and though this is oversimplified, it is basically what I'm wanting to do. If I am not elected, I shall work more intensively on the "sexier BTS", "take back from other distributions" and "debugging Debian" parts of my platform, as well as other QA projects, maybe even helping the release team later. Regards, -- Sam.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature