Re: GFDL position statement ballot invalid
Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> If the Secretary's creative interpretation is allowed to stand, the
> proper description of what is happening can only be that this proposal
> adds a new foundation document.
As you (and some others) are only arguing about the 3:1 supermajority
requirement, why don't you wait and see what happens in the vote? If
the option 3 doesn't win by a simple majority, there is no problem. If
it does win by a simple majority but not by a supermajority, you can
continue arguing the constitutional details.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Reply to: