Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:55:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:
>>
>> > If GDB were under BSD, you could:
>> >
>> > 1. Add docstrings to the sources of GDB in a way permissible by
>> > GFDL. In particular the invariant sections should be present in
>> > all opaque copies of the produced documentation. GFDL does not
>> > place restrictions on how the invariant sections are present in
>> > the transparent form, so it is enough if they exist in separate
>> > files.
>> >
>> > 2. Add the text of the BSD license in a new invariant section.
>> >
>> > 3. Use the following license for the new GDB sources:
>> >
>> > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify THE NAME
>> > under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
>> > 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
>> > Foundation; with with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR
>> > TITLES, with the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the
>> > Back-Cover Texts being LIST.
>> >
>> > Additionally, you have permission to use the non-commented parts
>> > of the sources of THE NAME under the following license:
>> >
>> > INCLUDE THE BSD LICENSE HERE
>>
>> And the result would be a *non-free program*.
>
> This is strange. :-) The program is covered under BSD license and you
> say it is non-free.
Anton, please consider what you are writing before posting. What you
wrote is content free and completely uninformative (as was the post
you are replying to). There is no explanation at all, so we are non
the wiser than had you not posted at all. This is not at all helpful.
Thanks for your consideration,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
Attachment:
pgp7GxvGbjDS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature