Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn@debian.org> writes:
> Please don't be so doggedly literal. The point of my little parody was to
> draw out, in a stark manner, the attitudes which seem to underlie the
> viewpoint which you hold, whether you're willing to spell them out or not.
> Our fellow readers can judge my assessment's plausibility for themselves.
No, this is simply not the attitudes which underlay my viewpoint.
> I have no idea what you're talking about. Nobody is calling for "strict
> majoritarianism". What is being called for is that the developers be
> allowed to decide issues of interpretation of the DFSG, as is their
> prerogative.
Ah, well, they do have that right. All I'm saying is that when their
"interpretation" is judged by the Secretary to be more in the nature
of a "repeal", they must do so by a 3:1 vote.
Reply to: