Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Feb 09, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>
>> Moreover, while I think a majority of the developers are surely
>> honorable, this is not true of everyone. Now that this is the *third*
>> time we are being asked to vote on essentially the same question, I
>> suspect that many of the proponents of the measure are simply
>> unwilling to let it drop, and will continue to pester the rest of the
>> project forever. This is not honorable behavior.
> Well, maybe the people who mislabeled the "everything is software" vote
> as an "editorial change" and deceived many other developers should have
> tought about this.
What about the second vote? How many votes do you need to lose,
before you decide that you have lost, and stop bringing it up over and
over again?
Reply to: