On Feb 09, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> wrote: > The binutils package generates part of its documentation from header > files in order to get the structures and constants right. The headers > are GPLed, the compiled documentation is under the GFDL. For this > relicensing to happen, one must be the copyright holder, or have an > appropriate license, which after a quick glance does not seem to be > there. Thus, only the FSF may build the binutils package. I'd be very > surprised if that were to meet your definition of free software. Did you ask FSF what they think about this situation? -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature