This one time, at band camp, Mike Hommey said: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 06:17:19PM +1100, Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:42:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes: > > > > > > > alternatively, print a single link to either the full documentation > > > > (containing the invariant sections) or to just the invariant sections. > > > > > > This might be a reasonable thing, but it is not what the GFDL requires. > > > > actually, it is. the GFDL explicitly says that you can provide a link to > > an internet site - and, contrary to loony zealot propaganda, it does not > > say that you must operate or maintain that site yourself. > > You forgot something... > > > If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document > > numbering more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Er, that just means if you distribute 100 copies, you need provide neither a transparent copy or a link. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature