Re: Anton's amendment

[Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> 
> > The text of my proposal clearly states that it is not a proposal to
> > modify the DFSG.  It is not even a proposal to interpret the existing
> > DFSG.  It makes some of the existing interpretations of DFSG invalid
> > but it doesn't suggest which interpretation is the right.
> 
> Then it _is_ a proposal to modify the DFSG: by excluding some
> interpretations, it makes the DFSG more specific.

Any proposal that states "GFDL is non-free" also makes DFSG more
specific but I doubt our secretary is going to require 3:1 majority
for the proposal favoured by him.

Anton Zinoviev