Re: Anton's amendment
Kalle Kivimaa <killer@debian.org> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>> All they need to do, if you are right, is proceed to declare that
>> their change is really just an interpretation of whatever is already
>> there. And, by hypothesis, they can present a claim that heck, a
>
> Actually, a group of developers, no matter how large, can proceed to
> claim whatever they want, but the project's interpretation is up to
> the secretary. If (s)he is in the minority of one, it is still _his_
> interpretation that matters, nobody elses.
This would be my view too. But we have people claiming that the
secretary is somehow remiss in deciding such a case himself, on the
sole grounds that there are a bunch of people who say they think
differently.
Reply to: