Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:30PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>
> The use cases I gave are just examples, I could think in other
> examples to show you the fact that they being invariant prevents it
> from fitting in a particular need, but that's not what's going to
> make us move forward...
I understand you point but I really belive that it is impossible to
think out better examples than the examples you already gave. I am
positive that if it is at all possible to think out interesting
example for a task that can not be solved because of the features of
GFDL then the same task could not be solved with some other license
that we already accept as free.
> This was what I tried to show you, not the opposite. My interpretation
> of DFSG3 is guided by freedom 1, which says "adapt it to your needs".
> Invariant sections are a restriction not covered by it.
I still belive that my interpretation of DFSG3 is the same as yours.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: