Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:17 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> The recommendation is: "License your documentation under the same license
> as the program it goes with. If you need to license under the GFDL for some
> reason, dual-licence."
>
> I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the
> documentation under the exact same license as the program was always the
> right thing to do. It saves *so* much trouble.
People tend to ask "... but can I really use a license such as the GPL
for documentation? I thought GPL was for software only."
Do we need to address this point?
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: