Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:
>
>> I'm confused. Where does it say that we have to go through the GR
>> process to issue a position statement for something the project has
>> already decided on?
>
> How do we know the project has decided on it?
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004
> Not a flippant question. That's felt like it's been missing from these
> discussions, and certainly RMS has, in the past, questioned whether the
> project has really decided on it. debian-legal is not a decision-making
> body. I agree with your take on the consensus, but I know other people
> certainly have not.
The implication of those two votes is that the Project intends that
the 100% of the Debian system must comply with the DFSG. Since it has
been proven that the GFDL is not a DFSG-free licence, the consequences
are clear.
If we do hold a GR over this decision, I won't be voting any
differently than I did in either of the above votes; my principles
haven't changed since last time I voted.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFDuE75VcFcaSW/uEgRAifmAKDpfALDCjuoXuOrG4ooL40UrHQ39ACg0598
sUF8CwibbgqYW1Wpdu8UogU=
=4k8S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: