Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2
Thanks for pointing me to information about this vote. I obviously
missed some parts of the debian-vote list, as I thought that newest
was listed first.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I have tried to determine what this vote is all about. I'm not
> > subscribed to either debian-vote or debian-devel so all I can
> > see is that is available from the web archives. I can not
> > find anything about this, so personally I think it is something
> > strange happening.
> > My questions are:
> > * What have the project leader decided? (if anything)
> > What delegations has been withdrawed? Why?
> > * Why can't I find anything on debian-vote or the Debian vote pages?
Ok, goog do know.
> > Everything _I_ write here can go public.
> Why did you write to -private then? Redirecting to -vote by setting
Because it was a reply to that list.
> The respective thread with pointers starts here:
Thanks a lot.
> cu andreas
> The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
> vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
> tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
> howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ----
/ firstname.lastname@example.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| email@example.com 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /