Re: Filibustering general resolutions
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:39:03 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> writes:
>> Instead, after 4-6 weeks beyond the date of the priginal proposal,
>> allow for 4*K developers to cut the proposal time short (say,
>> impose a deadline of now + 2 weeks). This means not only that the
>> interval is large, but a number of developers also feel that the
>> resolution is being stalled deliberately.
> I agree with Manoj that fixing the holes in the Constitution is a
> good thing, and I find Manoj's suggestion above a good solution to
> the (potential) problem. Manoj, are you going to write this out as a
> GR sometime soonish?
I am going to wait until some of the current GR's end, in
order to maintain a reasonable GR related workload ...
Nothing will dispel enthusiasm like a small admission fee. Kim Hubbard
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C