Re: kernel firmwares: GR proposal
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Sep 07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > The widely accepted custom was to interpret the DFSG this way, yes.
>> > This is what matters.
>> What is your evidence of this?
> My experience of 9 years in Debian, which can be verified by browsing
> the list archives.
I have not been the only one to be upset about the firmware situation
every time it has been brought up, as can be verified by browsing the
list archives. I can see that the controversy is old, but certainly
not that your interpretation was "widely accepted."