Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in
> > non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main.
> Madwifi contains non-free code that runs inside the kernel on the host
> processor. Whatever the project's opinion on firmware, madwifi is
> clearly non-free.
Yes, that's why we (including Aurélien) want to keep it in non-free.
Loïc Minier <firstname.lastname@example.org>